Risk of post-vasectomy infection using non-sterile gloves

A retrospective audit of 4785 office-based procedures

Authors

  • Jean-Philippe Bercier University of Ottawa
  • Valérie Dumais Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Bercier Clinic, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgery, Hawkesbury General Hospital, Hawkesbury, Ontario, Canada
  • Daniel Trottier Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Bercier Clinic, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgery, Hôpital Montfort, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  • Mélanie Savard-Côté Bercier Clinic, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Vasectomie 450, St-Eustache, Quebec, Canada
  • Michel Labrecque Research Center of the CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; Vasectomie Québec, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9603

Keywords:

Vasectomy, infection, antibiotics, medical audit

Abstract

Introduction: The use of sterile gloves in minor outpatient procedures, including vasectomy, remains debated. Performing vasectomies without sterile gloves may lower costs, shorten operative time, and reduce medical waste — important factors for efficiency and sustainability in high-volume practices. We evaluated the risk of post-vasectomy infection in a large cohort of patients who underwent no-scalpel vasectomy performed without sterile gloves.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all vasectomies performed by four physicians using non-sterile gloves from January 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025, across four Canadian outpatient clinics. Infection was defined as an antibiotic prescription within 30 days post-vasectomy recorded in the electronic medical record. We also assessed the effect of attending physician, use of skin glue for wound closure, and appointment duration. Differences were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test with Bonferroni-corrected significance set at p<0.017.

Results: Among 4785 vasectomies, four patients (0.08%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.03–0.2%) received antibiotics. No significant differences in infection risks were found between physicians (0.08% [2/3, 798], 0.13% [1/756], 0.93% [1/107], 0% [0/124]; p=0.07). Risks were also similar with vs. without skin glue (0.03% vs. 0.3%, p=0.04) and with short (<15 minutes) vs. longer (>30 minutes) appointment durations (0.07% vs. 0.4%, p=0.18).

Conclusions: Post-vasectomy infection risk with non-sterile gloves was very low. These findings support the use of non-sterile gloves for office-based no-scalpel vasectomy. Multicenter, prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings across diverse clinical settings. Further research should evaluate additional measures, such as skin glue, to reduce infection risk.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-07

How to Cite

Bercier, J.-P., Dumais, V., Trottier, D., Savard-Côté, M., & Labrecque, M. (2026). Risk of post-vasectomy infection using non-sterile gloves: A retrospective audit of 4785 office-based procedures. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 20(10). https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9603

Issue

Vol. 20 No. 10 (2026): CUAJ October

Section

Original Research

License

You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:

  • Post the Article on any Web site
  • Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.

The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.

You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.

The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:

  • That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
  • That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
  • That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
  • That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.