Morphologic and urodynamic predictors of renal scarring in pediatric neurogenic bladder

A cross-sectional study

Authors

  • Derya Yayla Izmir City Hospital, Department of Pediatric Urology
  • Zehra Aydın Gaziantep City Hospital

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9488

Keywords:

pediatric neurogenic bladder, detrusor pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), clean intermittent catheterization, VUR, Kidney Function

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the association of bladder diameter ratio (BDR), filling-phase detrusor pressure (Pdet), vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), age at initiation of clean intermittent catheterization (CIC), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with renal scarring in children with neurogenic bladder secondary to spinal dysraphism.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted, including 133 patients followed between October 2023 and January 2025. Urodynamic studies and voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) were performed within a short interval of dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scintigraphy. BDR was measured on standardized anteroposterior VCUG images as the mean of two independent measurements. Correlation analyses, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and multivariable logistic regression were performed. Internal validation was conducted using bootstrap resampling, and model calibration and decision curve analysis were also assessed.

Results: Renal scarring was identified in 55.6% of patients. Children with scarring had significantly higher BDR values (1.51±0.27 vs. 1.27±0.27, p<0.001). BDR demonstrated the strongest discrimination (area under the curve [AUC] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64–0.83) and remained the variable most strongly associated with renal scarring in multivariable analysis (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.027, p=0.002). Although Pdet >32 cmH₂O and high-grade VUR were associated with scarring, their effects were attenuated after adjustment. eGFR was lower in scarred patients (117.3 vs. 130.4 mL/min/1.73 m², p=0.003), although its early discriminatory performance was limited.

Conclusions: BDR showed the strongest association with renal scarring among the evaluated morphologic and urodynamic parameters. Pdet and VUR provided supportive but overlapping risk information, whereas eGFR reflected later functional decline. Because the BDR and Pdet thresholds in this study were derived from the present dataset, they should be interpreted as exploratory and require external validation before being used clinically. Given its availability from routine VCUG imaging, BDR may assist in identifying higher-risk patients pending confirmation in independent cohorts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-04

How to Cite

Yayla, D., & Aydın, Z. (2026). Morphologic and urodynamic predictors of renal scarring in pediatric neurogenic bladder: A cross-sectional study. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 20(9). https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9488

Issue

Vol. 20 No. 9 (2026): CUAJ September

Section

Original Research

License

You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:

  • Post the Article on any Web site
  • Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.

The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.

You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.

The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:

  • That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
  • That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
  • That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
  • That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.