The Canadian Anatomic Kidney Score
Assessment of reproducibility among surgeons and trainees across Canada
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9484Keywords:
kidney transplant, macroscopic analysis, kidney scores, CAKS, diabetesAbstract
Introduction: The Canadian Anatomic Kidney Score (CAKS) is a quantitative score used to assess donor kidneys, which has been shown to predict transplant outcomes. We hypothesized that the quantification of this score is highly reproducible across surgeons with varying levels of experience.
Methods: An anonymous survey was distributed to surgical attendings, fellows, and residents at teaching centers across Canada. The survey included photographs of six distinct kidneys (two images for each) taken during intraoperative back-table dissection. Participants evaluated the kidneys based on vascular features, anatomy, and sticky fat. Scores ranged from 0-2 points for each category. Comparisons of mean scores among residents, fellows, and staff were made using one-way ANOVA, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for each scoring factor and overall.
Results: Among the 35 respondents, 570 sets of evaluations were performed, with a mean evaluation time of one minute 37 seconds per kidney. Across the 18 survey questions, there was no significant difference in scoring among fellows, residents, and attendings, except for two of the six "sticky fat" image sets. The ICC for the CAKS overall was 0.78 when evaluated against a gold standard, and 0.80 when compared between raters, indicating excellent agreement between groups.
Conclusions: CAKS is reproducible by surgeons across different levels of training and various centers in Canada. This scoring system provides a reliable means to convey quantitative anatomic information between transplant professionals.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:
- Post the Article on any Web site
- Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
- Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
- Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.
The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.
You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.
The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:
- That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
- That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
- That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
- That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.
