Prospective evaluation of postoperative pain and opioid use after minor urologic surgery

Authors

  • Bonnie Liu Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
  • Joseph Moryousef Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
  • Kevin Feng Western University, London, ON, Canada
  • Jeffrey Campbell Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8344

Keywords:

opioid, minor urologic procedure, harm reduction

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Filling an opioid prescription after a minor urologic procedure increases patient risk of overdose and misuse. Strategies to reduce the number of opioids reaching the community are critical. This study evaluated opioid use after minor urologic procedures at a Canadian academic center and guides future prescribing recommendations.

METHODS: We prospectively evaluated patients over 18 years old undergoing minor urologic procedures (penile, scrotal, urethral, etc.) from September 2020 to May 2022. Consenting participants were given a pain diary and postoperative pain questionnaire. Patients on chronic pain medications or those who had major surgery within six months were excluded. Response rate, pain on visual analog scale, pain control satisfaction, quantity of opioids prescribed, and consumption of opioid and non-opioid medication were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS: Ninety-five patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 61.7 years (range 20–87) and 96% of patients identified as male. The response rate for the opioid diary and pain questionnaire was 57%. Forty-two patients (78%) were offered an opioid prescription following their surgery, but only 12 of those patients (22%) filled and consumed any opioid analgesics. Forty-two patients (78%) used no postoperative opioids, and the mean oral morphine equivalents (OME) consumed was 5.87 (standard deviation 16.7). There was a total of 259 OME unused from post-procedure prescriptions. The mean overall pain score for patients who did and did not fill opioid prescriptions were 3.18/10 and 1.79/10 (p<0.01), respectively, with mean overall pain management satisfaction score of 8.63/10 and 8.58/10 (p=0.94), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: Most patients undergoing minor urologic procedures do not require opioids to manage postoperative pain. Based on our data, we suggest that a prescription of 39 OME would adequately treat postoperative pain in 95% of patients undergoing minor urologic procedures. Education around pain management with non-narcotic modalities is imperative, and practice changes are warranted to address the opioid crisis within our specialty.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-29

How to Cite

Liu, B., Moryousef, J. ., Feng , K. ., & Campbell, J. . (2023). Prospective evaluation of postoperative pain and opioid use after minor urologic surgery . Canadian Urological Association Journal, 17(12), 388–92. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8344

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 12 (2023): CUAJ December

Section

Original Research

License

You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:

  • Post the Article on any Web site
  • Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.

The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.

You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.

The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:

  • That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
  • That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
  • That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
  • That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.