Discordance of community and hospital ultrasound reports for urological abnormalities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.78Abstract
Introduction: In Ontario, community ultrasound clinics do not require the onsitepresence of a radiologist at the time of imaging. In hospitals, a radiologistis always present for this step. We compared the discrepancy rate of communityand hospital ultrasound reports in a urology practice.
Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients whohad abdominal ultrasound performed in the community and in the hospital between April 1, 2001 and June 30, 2005. Reports were examined for indication, findings and whether there was a discrepancy. A medical student, a resident,and a staff physician each independently reviewed the findings.
Results: One hundred and twenty-two patients had abdominal ultrasound performed in the community and were followed up with hospital imaging. Sixty-nine patients had a community ultrasound followed by hospital ultrasound,with a discordance rate of 52.2%. Fifty-three patients had a community ultrasoundand then a hospital CT scan, with a discordance rate of 43.3%. Of patientswith discordant ultrasound reports, 23 had an additional CT scan in whichall findings were consistent with the hospital ultrasound findings.
Discussion: We found a very high discordance rate between community and hospital ultrasound reports. This is consistent with a study showing that theactive role of the radiologist in ultrasound imaging is very important for accurate reporting.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:
- Post the Article on any Web site
- Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
- Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
- Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.
The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.
You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.
The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:
- That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
- That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
- That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
- That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.