Initial experience with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the Canadian health care system

Authors

  • Joseph L. Chin Division of Urology, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Ont.
  • Patrick P. Luke Division of Urology, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Ont.
  • Stephen E. Pautler †Division of Urology, St. Joseph’s Health Care London, University of Western Ontario, London, Ont.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.50

Abstract

Background: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) has gained popularity in the United States due to claims of its superior 3-dimensional magnified vision and improved manual dexterity for surgeons that shorten the learningcurve and facilitate the transition from standard open radical prostatectomyto laparoscopic prostatectomy as a minimally invasive procedure. The Canadian health care system, however, faces unique challenges when dealing with theintroduction of new technologies. We report the initial experience with the useof the da Vinci robot for RALRP at the University of Western Ontario.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of the initial 30 cases ofRALRP with a minimum of 6 months follow-up. Data included the surgical times of various operative segments from cases 1–15 and 16–30, perioperative complications,early oncology and early functional results.

Results: The lack of dedicated resources initially led to sporadic and infrequentcases. Nevertheless, there was improvement in surgical proficiency with significantdifference in operative times between cases 1–15 and 16–30. Perioperativecomplications, though significant, were commensurate with reported early experiencesfrom other centres worldwide, which reflects the learning curve with RALRP.

Conclusion: Initiating a new surgical program that involves significant capital andmaintenance costs, such as an RALRP program, within the Canadian healthcare system poses unique challenges for the surgical team. Nevertheless, ourinitial experience has encouraged us to proceed with the next phase of evaluationfor the urological and oncological application of the technology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2012-12-10

How to Cite

Chin, J. L., Luke, P. P., & Pautler, S. E. (2012). Initial experience with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the Canadian health care system. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.50

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2007): CUAJ June

Section

Original Research

License

You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:

  • Post the Article on any Web site
  • Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.

The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.

You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.

The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:

  • That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
  • That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
  • That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
  • That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.