Redo hypospadias repair: experience at a tertiary care children’s hospital

Authors

  • Ahmed Al-Sayyad Division of Pediatric Urology, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
  • John G. Pike Division of Pediatric Urology, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
  • Michael P. Leonard Division of Pediatric Urology, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.39

Abstract

Objective: Treatment of patients with failed hypospadias repairs can be challenging.Our study aimed to determine the best type of redo repair dependingon the location and size of the urethral meatus, the status of the urethralplate and genital skin, the severity of residual chordee and the amount ofscar tissue.

Methods: The Institutional Review Board approved our retrospective chart reviewof patients who had a redo hypospadias repair at our institution over the past6 years. We recorded the type and number of previous repair(s), the type andnumber of redo procedure(s),as well as the complications and functional outcomes.

Results: There were 28 patients, aged 1–12 (mean 3.8) years, with failed hypospadiasrepairs. The initial severity of the hypospadias were as follows: perineal(1), penoscrotal (9), proximal shaft (1), mid-shaft (9), distal shaft (4), coronal(3) and mega-meatus (1). Of all the patients, 24 had 1 repair, 3 had 2 repairsand 1 had 3 repairs. The initial repairs comprised 11 tubularized island flaps(TIFs), 8 Snodgrass tubularized incised plate (TIP) techniques, 5 Mathieu repairs,1 Meatal Advancement and GlanuloPlasty Incorporated (MAGPI) technique,1 Pyramid, 1 Arap technique and 1 Thiersch-Duplay repair. Twenty-one of 28 patients had 1 redo operation, 5 had 2 redo operations, 1 had 3 redo operationsand 1 had 4 redo operations, for a total of 38 redo operations. Of these,26 were TIP techniques (68.4%), 3 were Mathieu (7.9%), 3 were TIF repairs(7.9%), 2 were onlay island flaps (5.3%) and 4 were buccal mucosal grafts(10.5%). Follow-up was 1–5 years (mean 3.5 yr). The final locations of urethralmeatus included glans (18), corona (6), mid-shaft (3) and penoscrotal (1).Complications after redo surgery comprised 4 urethrocutaneous fistulae, 2 meatalstenoses, 1 urethral stricture and 3 dehiscences. Sixteen patients were followedwith yearly uroflow with a Q-mean (mean uroflow) range of 3–14 mL/s (mean8.1 mL/s).

Conclusion: The majority of hypospadias failures can be salvaged with one operation.The TIP repair is our procedure of choice in most cases. In the settingof a poor urethral plate, TIF or buccal mucosa may be necessary. Complicationsare not infrequent in redo procedures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2012-12-10

How to Cite

Al-Sayyad, A., Pike, J. G., & Leonard, M. P. (2012). Redo hypospadias repair: experience at a tertiary care children’s hospital. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.39

Issue

Section

Original Research