Mediation analysis of adherence to pelvic floor muscle training and weekly self-monitoring on urinary symptoms in men with localized prostate cancer
A secondary analysis of the Prostate Cancer-Patient Empowerment Program (PC-PEP) randomized controlled trial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9525Keywords:
prostate cancer, survivorship, curative disease, urinary function, incontinence, PFMT, pelvic floor muscle training, patient education, patient empowerment, patient activation, eHealth, digital healthAbstract
Introduction: Men treated curatively for localized prostate cancer often experience urinary compli-cations that impairs quality of life. The Prostate Cancer-Patient Empowerment Program (PC-PEP) is a six-month digital intervention integrating pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), fitness, nutrition, and intimacy support. While early initiation of PC-PEP improves urinary outcomes, the influence of adherence remains unclear. This mediation analysis examined whether reported PFMT duration and engagement with self-monitoring mediate the association between timing of PC-PEP delivery (early vs. late) and urinary outcomes.
Methods: In a randomized crossover trial, 128 men with localized prostate cancer were assigned to receive PC-PEP immediately (early group, n=66) or after six months of standard care (late group, n=62). Urinary outcomes were assessed using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Weekly compliance surveys tracked en-gagement. Mediation and moderated mediation analyses adjusted for age, comorbidity, treatment modality, and baseline urinary function.
Results: Mean reported weekly PFMT duration did not differ between groups. The early group had higher compliance survey completion (98.8% vs. 64.1%, p<0.001) and higher post-intervention EPIC urinary incontinence scores (81.5±21.9 vs. 68.2±17.0, p<0.001), indicating better continence. Com-pliance survey completion mediated 41% of the association between early intervention and post-intervention EPIC urinary incontinence scores. No significant mediation was observed for IPSS or EPIC irritative/obstructive scores. Treatment modality did not moderate effects.
Conclusions: Early initiation of PC-PEP was associated with greater engagement in structured self-monitoring, which mediated improvements in urinary continence independent of reported PFMT duration. Integrating early patient activation and digital self-monitoring into post-treatment care may improve urinary continence outcomes and support scalable rehabilitation.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:
- Post the Article on any Web site
- Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
- Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
- Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.
The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.
You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.
The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:
- That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
- That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
- That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
- That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.







