Maximal kidney length predicts need for native nephrectomy in ADPCKD patients undergoing renal transplantation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.2128Keywords:
Nephrectomy, Renal Transplantation, Polycystic Kidney Disease, Kidney LengthAbstract
Introduction: Native nephrectomy in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is performed on a case-by-case basis. We determine if pre-transplant maximal kidney length (MKL) can be used to predict ultimate nephrectomy status.
Methods: We performed a retrospective review of ADPKD patients who underwent renal transplantation at our centre between January2000 and December 2012. Pre-transplant measurements of MKL alone, MKL adjusted for height (HtMKL), weight (WtMKL) and body mass index (BMI-MKL) were each assessed for their predictive ability via a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
Results: In total, 84 patients met our inclusion criteria, of which17 (20.2%) underwent native nephrectomy. An MKL ROC curve analysis revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.867 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.775–0.931; p < 0.001). An optimal cut-off criterion of >21.5 cm revealed a sensitivity of 94.1% (95% CI 71.3–99.9) and specificity of 70.1% (95% CI 57.7–80.7) for eventual nephrectomy. The AUC of HtMKL, WtMKL and BMI-MKL ROC curves did not differ significantly from MKL alone. HtMKL improved specificity, but not overall test performance. The determination of the cut-off MKL may be influenced by the single-centre retrospective nature of this analysis, as well as the fact that renal size was determined by ultrasound and not computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.
Conclusion: MKL in patients with ADPKD is associated with the eventual need for nephrectomy and may be a useful clinical tool to risk stratify these patients and therefore guide patient conversations to a decision to leave the native kidneys in situ.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:
- Post the Article on any Web site
- Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
- Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
- Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.
The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.
You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.
The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:
- That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
- That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
- That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
- That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.
