18F-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/ computed tomography vs. magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of prostate cancer: A meta-analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9534Keywords:
Prostatic Neoplasms; Positron-Emission Tomography; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen, humanAbstract
Introduction: The accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer remains a clinical challenge, with both multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and 18F-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) emerging as important imaging modalities. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of 18F-PSMA PET/CT vs. MRI for detecting prostate cancer.
Methods: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Multiple databases were searched through February 2025. Studies comparing 18F-PSMA PET/CT with MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis using histopathology as the reference standard were included. Random-effects models were used to pool sensitivity data, with heterogeneity assessed using I² statistics.
Results: Six studies comprising 310 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity for MRI was 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-0.99) with substantial heterogeneity (I²=93.8%). For 18F-PSMA PET/CT, the overall sensitivity was 0.50 (95% CI 0.12-0.87) with high heterogeneity (I²=96.0%). Subgroup analysis showed 18F-PSMA PET had a pooled sensitivity of 0.50 (95% CI 0.12-0.87), while MRI demonstrated 0.81 (95% CI 0.42-0.96). No significant publication bias was detected.
Conclusions: Both imaging modalities showed variable diagnostic performance across studies. The combination of PSMA PET/CT and MRI may provide complementary information for optimal prostate cancer detection, although substantial heterogeneity suggests the need for standardized protocols and larger prospective trials.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:
- Post the Article on any Web site
- Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
- Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
- Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.
The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.
You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.
The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:
- That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
- That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
- That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
- That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.
