Identifying factors influencing specialty choice in urology by female medical students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9244Keywords:
Gender equity, Graduate Medical Education, Women in urologyAbstract
INTRODUCTION: As of 2019, females represented 11% of the urology workforce in Canada. Lack of female role models, quality of life, and gender/sex discrimination may be important deterrent factors to female applicants entering surgical specialties. Limited research exists on which factors are important in choosing urology as a specialty by female applicants. In this study, we aimed to determine which factors affect specialty choice in urology by medical school applicants and to identify any disparities by sex.
METHODS: From November 2022 to May 2023, a survey was distributed to medical students enrolled in all Canadian medical schools. The questionnaire included 23 factors that may affect specialty choice. A five-point Likert scale was used to assess each factor’s influence on the student’s interest in urology. Pearson-Chi squared test was used to compare response rates between sexes.
RESULTS: A total of 424 Canadian medical students responded to the survey. Common incentivizing factors for choosing urology as a specialty were medical-surgical approach, doctor-patient relationship, and financial benefits. Common deterrent factors were perception that urology is a male-dominated field, lifestyle of surgical residencies, and lack of female role models in urology. Females were more likely to report lower clinical exposure to urology and be deterred by the male predominance in the field.
CONCLUSIONS: While female medical students are more likely to be disincentivized to choose urology as a specialty due to it being a male-dominated field, early exposure through research, role models, or shadowing is essential to incentivize interest in urology among female medical students.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:
- Post the Article on any Web site
- Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
- Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
- Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.
The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.
You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.
The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:
- That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
- That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
- That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
- That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.
