Oxygen-rich dressing for hypospadias repair
Systematic review and meta-analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9764Keywords:
Hypospadias, Oxygen-rich dressing, ozonated dressing, conventional wound dressing (CWD), postoperative complications, Systematic Review, Meta-AnalysisAbstract
Introduction: Postoperative dressing selection after hypospadias repair varies widely and is largely guided by surgeon preference. Oxygen-enriched and ozone-based topical dressings have demonstrated antimicrobial and wound-healing benefits in other settings, but their role after hypospadias repair remains unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate outcomes associated with oxygen-rich or ozone-based dressings compared with standard postoperative care.
Methods: We searched CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and trial registries from inception to July 31, 2025, for clinical studies comparing oxygen- or ozone-based dressings with standard postoperative care. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy, abstracts without full-text, and basic science studies were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened studies and assessed risk of bias using RoB 2. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed using mean differences (MD) and risk ratios (RR).
Results: Of 594 records identified, three randomized controlled trials met inclusion criteria, comprising 264 children undergoing primary distal hypospadias repair. All studies had some concerns or high risk of bias, mainly due to lack of preregistration and incomplete blinding of subjective outcomes. Compared with standard dressings, oxygen- or ozone-based dressings were associated with shorter wound-healing time (MD -9.80 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] -15.85 to -3.75, I²=89%) and fewer reoperations (relative risk [RR] 0.24, 95% CI 0.07−0.75, I²=0%). Differences in foreskin dehiscence, wound infection, and urethrocutaneous fistula were not statistically significant.
Conclusions: Limited randomized evidence suggests oxygen-rich or ozone-based dressings may improve early healing and reduce reoperations after distal hypospadias repair, while no statistically significant differences were observed for individual complications. Larger, methodologically rigorous trials are needed before routine adoption can be recommended.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:
- Post the Article on any Web site
- Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
- Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
- Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.
The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.
You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.
The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:
- That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
- That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
- That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
- That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.
