A decade of pediatric laser lithotripsy

Location-driven outcomes and a targeted analysis of lower-pole stone clearance

Authors

  • Hooman Ebrahimi The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids)
  • Samer Maher The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids)
  • Joana Dos Santos The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids)
  • Frank Papanikolaou The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids)
  • Armando J. Lorenzo The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids)
  • Mandy Rickard The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids)
  • Usman Kahloon The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids)
  • Mith L. Concio The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids)
  • Michael E. Chua The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9649

Keywords:

Pediatric urolithiasis, Laser lithotripsy, Ureteroscopy, Lower-pole stones, Thulium fiber laser, Surgical outcomes, Endourology

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic laser lithotripsy is becoming the mainstay for pediatric urolithiasis management, and the location of stones strongly influences the stone-free outcome. This study reports location-specific stone-free rates and evaluates factors associated with the clearance of lower-pole stones.

Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective review of all children ≤18 years undergoing endoscopic laser lithotripsy between January 2015 and December 2024. Stone-free status was defined as the absence of a residual fragment >2 mm on imaging, obtained at least eight weeks postoperatively. Location-specific clearance was compared, and predictors of lower-pole clearance were evaluated.

Results: Among 164 cases (mean age 10.4±5.4 years), the overall stone-free rate was 73.8%. Outcomes varied significantly by location (p<0.001): bladder 96.4%, distal ureter 96.2%, upper calyx 71.4%, renal pelvis 68.4%, proximal ureter 66.7%, and lower pole 52.5%. Repeat procedures were required in 14% of cases. In the lower-pole cohort (n=40), clearance was associated with thulium fiber laser use (77.8% vs. 31.8% for holmium:YAG, p=0.004), single vs. multiple stones (80% vs. 36%, p=0.007), favorable composition (mixed calcium or cystine, p=0.036), and older age (>12 years, p=0.04). Stone size was not associated with the stone-free rate.

Conclusions: Endoscopic laser lithotripsy is effective across most pediatric stone sites, but lower-pole stones remain challenging, with clearance achieved in only half of cases. Adoption of thulium fiber laser, careful counseling for younger children or those with multiple stones, and tailored operative strategies may improve outcomes. Prospective, multicenter studies are warranted.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-20

How to Cite

Ebrahimi, H., Maher, S., Dos Santos, J., Papanikolaou, F., Lorenzo, A. J., Rickard, M., … Chua, M. E. (2026). A decade of pediatric laser lithotripsy: Location-driven outcomes and a targeted analysis of lower-pole stone clearance. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 20(12). https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9649

Issue

Vol. 20 No. 12 (2026): CUAJ December

Section

Original Research

License

You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:

  • Post the Article on any Web site
  • Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.

The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.

You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.

The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:

  • That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
  • That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
  • That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
  • That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.