Use of equipment whiteboard checklists in improving communication while reducing case cost during ureteroscopy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9581Keywords:
endourology, surgical repair, ureter, ureteroscopy, communication, healthcare costsAbstract
Introduction: Effective communication is essential in operating room (OR) settings to reduce interruptions, ensure patient safety, and reduce equipment-related waste. In the setting of percutaneous nephrolithotomy equipment, whiteboards improved OR staff perceptions of communication and decreased procedural costs. Given that ureteroscopy has varying equipment needs from case to case, we sought to evaluate the effectiveness of equipment whiteboard implementation in ureteroscopy.
Methods: Thirty-three urology OR staff were recruited to complete questionnaires assessing confidence in equipment accuracy and efficacy of communication both with and without the equipment whiteboard. Furthermore, 50 cases were randomly allocated 1:1 into having the surgeon verbally indicate equipment needs compared to using the whiteboard. These procedures were assessed for objective accuracy of equipment, case length, case cost, and number of interruptions. All outcomes were compared between groups using two-sided T-tests and Fisher’s exact tests.
Results: From the questionnaires, we found significant increases with the whiteboard in confidence equipment was in the room (p<0.001, confidence interval [CI] -5.386, -3.621), confidence required equipment was opened (p<0.001, CI -4.956, -3.015), and confidence nothing unnecessary was opened (p<0.001, CI -5.432, -3.393). Furthermore, we found significant improvements in objective equipment accuracy scores (p<0.001, CI -3.982, -1.618), a significant reduction in interruptions (p=0.001, CI -1.147, -0.293), and an average 25% decrease in equipment-related procedural costs (p=0.018, CI 30.661, 313.099).
Conclusions: Implementation of an equipment whiteboard for ureteroscopy was effective for improving OR staff confidence in equipment choices and perceptions of communication. Furthermore, the whiteboard improved equipment accuracy while reducing interruptions and procedural costs.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:
- Post the Article on any Web site
- Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
- Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
- Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.
The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.
You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.
The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:
- That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
- That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
- That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
- That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.
