Analysis of urinary tract infections as a predictor of obstruction in women with a history of urethral sling surgery

Authors

  • Arushi Wadhwa Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa
  • Ailsa May Li Gan Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital
  • James Ross Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Scarborough Health Network
  • Duane Hickling Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9514

Keywords:

urinary tract infections, midurethral slings, bladder outlet obstruction, urodynamics

Abstract

Introduction: Mid-urethral sling (MUS) remains a widely used and effective treatment for stress urinary incontinence, although complications such as voiding dysfunction and urinary tract infections (UTIs) may occur. Prior research has shown that up to 60% of women with chronic lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) after MUS surgery meet objective criteria for bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). This exploratory study aimed to assess whether UTI burden is associated with the presence of BOO in women with chronic LUTS following MUS. Secondarily, UTI patterns before and after urethral sling excision were descriptively evaluated.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted examining women with a history of MUS and persistent LUTS for at least six months at a single tertiary care center. Obstruction was assessed using urodynamic studies according to Blaivas criteria or fluoroscopic evidence. UTIs were defined using a combination of culture-positive results and documented symptomatic episodes. Associations between UTI burden and obstruction were evaluated using exploratory regression analyses, and symptom outcomes were assessed before and after sling lysis.

Results: Among 95 patients, 58 (61%) demonstrated urodynamic evidence of obstruction. Across the entire cohort, the median number of UTIs over a two-year period was 0. The proportion of patients with at least one UTI did not differ significantly between obstructed and non-obstructed groups (Fisher’s exact test, p=0.80). On exploratory multivariable logistic regression adjusting for age, menopausal status, and diabetes, the association between pre-lysis UTI burden and obstruction was not statistically significant (odds ratio [OR] 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90–1.29, p=0.42). Fifty-seven patients underwent sling lysis. In obstructed patients undergoing lysis, UTI frequency did not change significantly postoperatively (p=0.29), although many patients reported subjective improvement in storage and voiding symptoms.

Conclusions: In this exploratory cohort of women with chronic LUTS following MUS, UTI burden was not observed to be associated with the presence of BOO. While sling excision was associated with subjective symptom improvement, changes in UTI frequency were not statistically significant. These findings suggest that UTI history alone may have limited utility as a clinical marker of obstruction and highlight the need for larger, prospective studies with standardized outcome measures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-07

How to Cite

Wadhwa, A., Gan, A. M. L., Ross, J., & Hickling, D. (2026). Analysis of urinary tract infections as a predictor of obstruction in women with a history of urethral sling surgery. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 20(10). https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9514

Issue

Vol. 20 No. 10 (2026): CUAJ October

Section

Original Research

License

You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:

  • Post the Article on any Web site
  • Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.

The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.

You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.

The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:

  • That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
  • That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
  • That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
  • That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.