Frailty and nutritional status predict postoperative complications in radical cystectomy patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9166Keywords:
Frailty, radical cystectomy, surgical outcomesAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Radical cystectomy (RC) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. While frailty and nutritional status have emerged as important predictors of surgical outcomes, their impact on RC complications remains incompletely characterized. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between frailty (using the Modified Frailty Index-5 [mFI-5], nutritional status (using the Nutritional Risk Index [NRI]), and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing RC.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Frailty was defined as mFI-5 score ≥2 and malnutrition as NRI ≤97.5. Hypoalbuminemia was defined as preoperative albumin ≤3.5. Outcomes included 30-day complications, length of stay, and mortality.
RESULTS: Among 8297 patients, 1793 (21.6%) were classified as frail. Frail patients experienced higher rates of infectious (sepsis: 10.2% vs. 6.72%, p<0.001), cardiopulmonary (myocardial infarction: 2.56% vs. 1.09%, p<0.001), and renal (renal insufficiency: 9.53% vs. 5.23%, p<0.001) complications. Mortality was twice as high in frail patients (2.45% vs. 1.17%, p<0.001). Among 8297 patients with nutritional data, 668 (8.05%) were malnourished, and 910 (15.2%) had hypoalbuminemia. Malnourished patients had higher rates of transfusion requirements (46.4% vs. 24.9%, p<0.001) and mortality (2.54% vs. 1.35%, p=0.032). Hypoalbuminemic patients demonstrated increased major complications (56.7% vs. 38.5%, p<0.001). The predictive accuracy of these indices varied by outcome, with area under the curve values ranging from 0.53-0.63.
CONCLUSIONS: Both frailty and poor nutritional status are associated with increased postoperative complications and mortality following RC; however, the modest predictive accuracy of these indices indicates they should be used as part of a broader risk assessment strategy.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:
- Post the Article on any Web site
- Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
- Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
- Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.
The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.
You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.
The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:
- That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
- That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
- That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
- That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.







