Does marginalization status and distance from the hospital impact the timing of pediatric pyeloplasty in a universal access-to-care system

Authors

  • Adree Khondker University of Toronto
  • Rahim Dhalla Western University
  • David-Dan Nguyen
  • Jethro C.C. Kwong University of Toronto
  • Yerin Lee University of Toronto
  • Jeremy Wu University of Toronto
  • Jin Kyu Kim University of Toronto
  • Michael E. Chua The Hospital for Sick Children
  • Mandy Rickard The Hospital for Sick Children
  • Armando J. Lorenzo The Hospital for Sick Children

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9133

Keywords:

pyeloplasty, pelviureteric junction obstruction, antenatal hydronephrosis, marginalization

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Prior research in the U.S. suggests that marginalized populations tend to undergo pyeloplasty earlier, likely reflecting concerns about the challenges of reliable followup care in this population. This study assessed the effect of sociodemographic marginalization and geographic distance on the timing of pyeloplasty in a universal, single-payer healthcare system.

METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective study on children undergoing pyeloplasty from 2008-2019. We assessed the impact of marginalization indices (with the Ontario Marginalization Index [ON-Marg]) and geographic distance on timing of pyeloplasty, preoperative ultrasound findings, and renogram features. Unadjusted analysis and Cox proportional regression were performed to determine the effect of marginalization and geography on timing of pyeloplasty.

RESULTS: Among 503 patients who underwent pyeloplasty, the median age at surgery was 16 months. Median preoperative anteroposterior diameter (APD) was 22 mm, and split renal function on renogram was 43%. There was no significant effect of marginalization indices on age at surgery. Patients living >50 km from the hospital had a later age at surgery than those living <10 km (p=0.04); however, there was no significant difference in preoperative APD or split function by marginalization index or geographic distance. Adjusted analyses revealed no significant associations between ON-Marg variables or geographic distance with age at surgery.

CONCLUSIONS: In a universal healthcare system, marginalization status and geographic distance were not associated with the timing of pyeloplasty. These results contrast with literature from other settings and suggest that access to care can mitigate disparities in pediatric urology care.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-17

How to Cite

Khondker, A., Dhalla, R., Nguyen, D.-D., Kwong, J. C., Lee, Y., Wu, J., … Lorenzo, A. J. (2025). Does marginalization status and distance from the hospital impact the timing of pediatric pyeloplasty in a universal access-to-care system . Canadian Urological Association Journal, 19(8), 249–54. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9133

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 8 (2025): CUAJ August

Section

Original Research

License

You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:

  • Post the Article on any Web site
  • Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.

The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.

You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.

The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:

  • That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
  • That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
  • That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
  • That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.