Patients with microscopic and gross hematuria: practice and referral patterns among primary care physicians in a universal health care system
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.589Abstract
Background: Hematuria is one of the most common findings on
urinalysis in patients encountered by primary care physicians. In
many instances it can also be the first presentation of a serious urological
problem. As such, we sought to evaluate current practices
adopted by primary care physicians in the workup and screening
of hematuria.
Methods: Questionnaires were mailed to all registered primary care
physicians across Quebec. Questions covered each physician’s
personal approach to men and postmenopausal women with painless
gross hematuria or with asymptomatic microscopic hematuria,
as well as screening techniques, general knowledge with regards
to urine collection and sampling, and referral patterns.
Results: Of the surveys mailed, 599 were returned. Annual routine
screening urinalysis on all adult male and female patients was
performed by 47% of respondents, regardless of age or risk factors.
Of all the respondents, 95% stated microscopic hematuria was
associated with bladder cancer. However, in an older male with
painless gross hematuria, only 64% of respondents recommended
further evaluation by urology. On the other hand, in a postmenopausal
woman with 2 consecutive events of significant microscopic
hematuria, only 48.6% recommended referral to urology. Findings
were not associated with the gender of the respondent, experience
or geographic location of practice (urban vs. rural).
Interpretation: There seems to be reluctance amongst primary care
physicians to refer patients with gross or significant microscopic
hematuria to urology for further investigation. A higher level of
suspicion and further education should be implemented to detect
serious conditions and to offer earlier intervention when possible.
Downloads
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:
- Post the Article on any Web site
- Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
- Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
- Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.
The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.
You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.
The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:
- That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
- That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
- That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
- That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.