Exposure to radiation and medical oncology training: A survey of Canadian urology residents and fellows

Authors

  • Amandeep S. Taggar Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre Department of Radiation Oncology University of Toronto http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3562-5890
  • Kevin Martell Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
  • Siraj Husain Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
  • Michael Peacock Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC
  • Michael Sia Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Abbotsford, BC
  • Geoffrey Gotto Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Calgary, AB

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.5147

Abstract

Introduction: Residency experiences and teaching in oncology among urology residents are variable across Canada. We sought to identify how radiation and medical oncology concepts, as they pertain to genitourinary malignancies, are taught to urology residents.

Methods: A total of 190 trainees enrolled in Canadian urology residency training programs were invited to participate in the study from January 2016 to June 2016. Participants completed an online questionnaire addressing the training they received.

Results: The overall response rate was 32%. Twenty-three percent of respondents were in their fellowship year; 17%, 20%, 10%, 17%, and 12% were first-, second-, third-, fourth-, and fifth-year residents, respectively, with a median of four (range 1–9) respondents from each training program. Ninety-five percent of respondents had academic half-day (AHD) as part of their training that included radiotherapy (61%) and chemotherapy (51%) teaching. Most respondents indicated their main exposure to chemotherapy and radiation came from informal teaching in urology clinics. Twentynine percent and 41%, of participants had mandatory rotations in radiation and medical oncology, respectively. Only 6% of respondents used their voluntary elective time in these disciplines and most voluntary electives were of 1–2-week duration. Despite this, 90% of respondents preferred some mandatory radiation and medical oncology training.

Conclusions: Most of the limited exposure that urology residents have to medical and radiation oncology is through AHD or informal urology clinics, despite a desire among current urology trainees to have clinical exposure in these areas. Moving forward, urology residency programs should consider integrating medical and radiation oncology rotations into the residency program curriculum.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Amandeep S. Taggar, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre Department of Radiation Oncology University of Toronto

Radiation Oncologist, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre

Assistant Professor, Department of Radiation Oncology
University of Toronto

Downloads

Published

2018-05-25

How to Cite

Taggar, A. S., Martell, K., Husain, S., Peacock, M., Sia, M., & Gotto, G. (2018). Exposure to radiation and medical oncology training: A survey of Canadian urology residents and fellows. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.5147

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 10 (2018): CUAJ October

Section

Original Research

License

You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:

  • Post the Article on any Web site
  • Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.

The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.

You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.

The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:

  • That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
  • That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
  • That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
  • That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.