Do urologists follow the golden rule? A global urolithiasis management study by the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society

  • Gregory Roberts Queen's University
  • Dedan Opondo
  • Linda Nott Western University
  • Hassan Razvi Western University
  • Jean de la Rosette AMC University Hospital
  • Darren Beiko Queen's University

Abstract

Introduction: The primary objective of this study was to compare surgical management options for various urolithiasis scenarios that urologists would choose for themselves vs. the options they would recommend for their patients. The secondary objective was to identify the common recommended treatments for upper urinary tract stones of various sizes and locations.

Methods: Two surveys were sent by the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) to members of the Endourological Society. Standard demographic information was collected. The first survey asked the urologists to recommend treatment for urolithiasis in 10 different scenarios assuming that they were the patient with stone disease. The second survey, sent eight months later, asked urologists to recommend treatment for the same 10 scenarios for a theoretical patient. Only urologists who responded to the first and the second survey were included. Recommended treatment options were compared between the surveys. Agreement between the two scenarios was measured with Cohen’s kappa. Surveys were conducted on the Internet using SurveyMonkey™. All statistical analyses were performed using R statistical program version 2.12.2.

Results: The two surveys had response rates of 78% (160/205) and 84% (172/205), respectively with urologists from 38 countries. Median experience of respondents was seven years (range: 2‒30). The majority of respondents, 117 (75%), were affiliated with academic hospitals. Recommended treatments for stone disease in different scenarios were not entirely consistent when the urologists considered themselves as the patients compared to the choice they might recommend for their patients. Cohen’s kappa ranged from 0.292‒0.534 for the different scenarios. Overall, shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and ureteroscopy (URS) were the most commonly chosen treatment options, with medical expulsive therapy (MET) and laparoscopy being the least recommended by urologists for themselves, as well as for their patients.

Conclusions: Although urologists were not entirely consistent in their recommendations for stone treatment, they generally followed the “golden rule” and treated their patients as they would want to be treated. The most commonly recommended treatments for upper urinary tract stones were SWL and URS.

Author Biography

Darren Beiko, Queen's University

Associate Professor, Department of Urology, Queen's University

Published
2016-02-16
How to Cite
Roberts, G., Opondo, D., Nott, L., Razvi, H., de la Rosette, J., & Beiko, D. (2016). Do urologists follow the golden rule? A global urolithiasis management study by the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 10(1-2), 50-4. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.3282
Section
Original Research