Urothelial bladder cancer in young adults: Diagnosis, treatment and clinical behaviour

  • Bülent Gunlusoy
  • Yasin Ceylan
  • Tansu Degirmenci
  • Zafer Kozacioğlu
  • Tarık Yonguc
  • Halil Bozkurt
  • Ozgü Aydoğdu
  • Volkan Sen
Keywords: urothelial bladder cancer, young adult, diagnosis, tretment


Introduction: The aim of the study is to reveal pathologic characteristics and clinical behaviour of patients 40 years old or younger diagnosed with and treated for urothelial bladder carcinoma.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and pathologic data of 91 patients, initially diagnosed and treated at our institution from May 1996 to December 2014. Cancer recurrence was defined as new occurrence of bladder cancer at the same or different sites of the bladder. Cancer progression was defined as an increase in stage or grade in any of the recurrences.

Results: The mean age was 33.8 (range: 17–40) years. The pathological examination after transurethral resection revealed 83 (91.2%) patients with non-muscle invasive urothelial bladder cancer, and 8 (8.8%) patients with muscle invasive urothelial bladder cancer. According to the distribution of grade, there were 75, 4 and 12 patients with grade 1, grade 2 and grade 3 diseases, respectively. Initial cancer staging was: pTa with 40 patients (43.9%), pT1 with 43 patients (47.2%), pT2 with 7 patients (7.6%), and pT3 with 1 patient (1.2%). While 17 (18.6%) patients recurred in the followup, 10 (10.9%) patients had progression. There were no differences in recurrence and progression rates in the Ta and T1 stages between groups (p = 0.233, p = 0.511, respectively).

Conclusion: The risk of progression increased as the number of relapses increased. The clinical behaviour of high-stage and highgrade disease in younger patients is similar to the older group.

How to Cite
Gunlusoy, B., Ceylan, Y., Degirmenci, T., Kozacioğlu, Z., Yonguc, T., Bozkurt, H., Aydoğdu, O., & Sen, V. (2015). Urothelial bladder cancer in young adults: Diagnosis, treatment and clinical behaviour. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 9(9-10), E727-30. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.3049
Original Research