Does perineural invasion in a radical prostatectomy specimen predict biochemical recurrence in men with prostate cancer?

Authors

  • Fairleigh Reeves Department of Urology and Surgery, University of Melbourne, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia
  • Christopher M. Hovens 1Department of Urology and Surgery, University of Melbourne, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia 2Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre Epworth, Richmond, Australia
  • Laurence Harewood 1Department of Urology and Surgery, University of Melbourne, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia 2Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre Epworth, Richmond, Australia
  • Shayne Battye
  • Justin S. Peters 1Department of Urology and Surgery, University of Melbourne, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia 2Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre Epworth, Richmond, Australia
  • Anthony J. Costello 1Department of Urology and Surgery, University of Melbourne, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia 2Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre Epworth, Richmond, Australia
  • Niall M. Corcoran 1Department of Urology and Surgery, University of Melbourne, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia 2Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre Epworth, Richmond, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.2619

Keywords:

Prostate cancer, perineural invasion, biochemical recurrence, prostatectomy, prognosis

Abstract

Introduction: The ability of perineural invasion (PNI) in radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens to predict biochemical recurrence (BCR) is unclear. This study investigates this controversial question in a large cohort.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was undertaken of prospectively collected data from 1497 men who underwent RP (no neoadjuvant therapy) for clinically localized prostate cancer. The association of PNI at RP with other clinicopathological parameters was evaluated. The correlation of clinicopathological factors and BCR (defined as prostate-specific antigen [PSA] >0.2 ng/mL) was investigated with univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis in 1159 men.

Results: PNI-positive patients were significantly more likely to have a higher RP Gleason score, pT3 disease, positive surgical margins, and greater cancer volume (p < 0.0005). The presence of PNI significantly correlated with BCR on univariable (hazard ratio 2.30, 95% confidence interval 1.50–3.55, p < 0.0005), but not multivariable analysis (p = 0.602). On multivariable Cox regression analysis the only independent prognostic factors were preoperative PSA, RP Gleason score, pT-stage, and positive surgical margin status. These findings are limited by a relatively short follow-up time and retrospective study design.

Conclusions: PNI at RP is not an independent predictor of BCR. Therefore, routine reporting of PNI is not indicated. Future research should be targeted at the biology of PNI to increase the understanding of its role in prostate cancer progression.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2015-05-13

How to Cite

Reeves, F., Hovens, C. M., Harewood, L., Battye, S., Peters, J. S., Costello, A. J., & Corcoran, N. M. (2015). Does perineural invasion in a radical prostatectomy specimen predict biochemical recurrence in men with prostate cancer?. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 9(5-6), E252–5. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.2619

Issue

Section

Original Research