Authorship trends in urology literature

A bibliometric analysis by gender

Authors

  • Maya Morcos Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1561-6746
  • Amir-Ali Golrokhian-Sani Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0384-8472
  • Cerine Benomar Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa
  • Marc Morcos
  • Kiera Liblik Department of Urology and the Centre for Applied Urological Research, Queen’s University
  • D. Robert Siemens Department of Urology and the Centre for Applied Urological Research, Queen’s University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9644

Keywords:

Female gender, Gender Bias, Women in urology, Physicians, Women

Abstract

Introduction: The increasing entry of women into urology underscores the need to evaluate academic representation and characterize ongoing disparities within the specialty. This study provides a comprehensive global assessment of gender representation in urologic literature over time by study design, journal type, and geographic region.

Methods: All PubMed database abstracts under “Urology”[MeSH] or “Urology” (January 2002 to January 2024) were evaluated. Authorship position, institutional affiliation country, and journal name were extracted. Descriptive statistics and inferential tests were performed to assess gender-based differences in publication characteristics through validated name-to-gender matching tools.

Results: A total of 130 621 publications comprising 885 343 author names were included, of which 21.7% were identified as women. The proportion of women authors increased significantly from 11.4% in 2002 to 26.3% in 2024 (p<0.001). Overall, the number of women in senior authorship positions (14.8%) remains lower than in first-authorship roles (21.6%). The lowest representation of overall women authors was from African institutions (15.3%), whereas the highest was from European institutions (27.3%). Women published less proportionally than men across all study designs, particularly in interventional research (18.5%) and case reports (17.2%). First and senior women authors had higher odds of publishing in predatory journals compared with non-predatory journals (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12−1.24; AOR 1.21, 95% CI 1.14−1.28, respectively).

Conclusions: Despite progress, substantial gender disparities persist in authorship in urology research, particularly in senior authorship roles. This global bibliometric analysis highlights the need to better understand the barriers that limit female representation in urologic publications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-07

How to Cite

Morcos, M., Golrokhian-Sani, A.-A., Benomar, C., Morcos, M., Liblik, K., & Siemens, D. R. (2026). Authorship trends in urology literature: A bibliometric analysis by gender . Canadian Urological Association Journal, 20(10). https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9644

Issue

Vol. 20 No. 10 (2026): CUAJ October

Section

Original Research

License

You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:

  • Post the Article on any Web site
  • Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.

The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.

You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.

The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:

  • That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
  • That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
  • That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
  • That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.