Quality assessment of robotic repair of benign ureteral strictures

A Canadian, single-center experience

Authors

  • William Luke Western University
  • Archit Jain
  • Christina Lim
  • Heather Rotz
  • Zoe Myers University of Ottawa
  • Reza Lahiji Emory University
  • Patrick P.W. Luke

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9379

Keywords:

robotic surgery, laparoscopy, ureteral stricture, ureteral repair, ureteral reimplantation, buccal graft, appendiceal flap, Boari flap, ureteral rest

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Endourologic treatments are first-line interventions for short ureteral strictures. With long strictures and endourologic failures, open repair has historically been used; however, robotic-assisted approaches have recently been shown to be effective. As a quality measure, we wanted to assess the performance of robotic ureteral reconstruction compared with open surgical repair during our transition to robotic surgery at a Canadian tertiary care center.

METHODS: From 2011-2024, 43 complex ureteral stricture cases (19 open, 24 robotic) were performed. The primary outcome was six-month success defined by a composite of stent/pain-free status and renogram elimination half-life (T½). Secondary outcomes included length of stay, operative time, estimated blood loss, and complications.

RESULTS: Success rates at six months were non-significantly different between robotic and open repair (83% vs. 79%, p=0.36). Length of stay was shorter in the robotic group (3.1±1.9 vs. 4.9±3.3 days, p=0.018). Estimated blood loss (231±84 vs. 244±170 mL, p=0.30) and operative time (220±67 vs. 214±74 minutes, p=0.40) were comparable between groups. Complication rates were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Overall, robotic reconstruction yields equivalent six-month success to open repair, with shorter length of stay. These findings support continuing robotic-assisted ureteral reconstruction as a safe and effective alternative to open surgery, offering equivalent short-term success and reduced hospital stay.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-15

How to Cite

Luke, W., Jain, A., Lim, C., Rotz, H., Myers , Z., Lahiji, R., & Luke, P. P. (2025). Quality assessment of robotic repair of benign ureteral strictures: A Canadian, single-center experience . Canadian Urological Association Journal, 20(2), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9379

Issue

Vol. 20 No. 2 (2026): CUAJ February

Section

Original Research

License

You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:

  • Post the Article on any Web site
  • Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.

The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.

You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.

The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:

  • That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
  • That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
  • That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
  • That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.