Development of a preoperative risk prediction model of muscleinvasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma using clinical and radiomic computed tomography features
Initial results from a multi-institutional, Canadian study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9370Keywords:
UTUC, Radiomics, Artificial Intelligence, Risk StratificationAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Accurate pre-intervention staging of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) remains a significant clinical challenge, particularly in identifying muscle-invasive disease (≥pT2), where kidney-sparing surgery may not be appropriate. Current imaging and biopsy approaches are often inadequate. Radiomics, which extracts high-dimensional features from medical imaging, may improve non-invasive staging. This study assessed whether computed tomography (CT)-based radiomic features, alone or combined with clinical data, could predict ≥pT2 UTUC in a multicenter Canadian cohort.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical, pathologic, and radiographic features of patients with UTUC who underwent extirpative surgery at five academic centers from January 2, 2001, to May 1, 2023. Radiomic features were extracted from machine-learning segmentations of the affected kidney using the excretory phase of CT. Predictive models were developed using clinical-only, radiomic-only, and combined data to predict stage ≥pT2. Feature selection included univariable logistic regression, correlation filtering, and LASSO . Model performance was assessed via five-fold cross-validation repeated 10 times, with area under the curve (AUC) as the primary metric.
RESULTS: Of 441 patients, 208 (47.2%) were included. Of the 208 patients, 97 (46.6%) had ≥pT2 disease. The clinical model (AUC 0.602) included age, hydronephrosis, and high-grade cytology. The radiomics model, based on two texture features, achieved an AUC of 0.653. The combined model achieved an AUC of 0.647. Radiomics and combined models significantly outperformed the clinical model (p<0.01), but did not differ from each other. For 117 patients with renal pelvis cancers, the combined model’s discrimination performance was statistically better than the clinical model (AUC 0.708 vs. AUC 0.607, p<0.001). Likewise, the radiomics’ AUC discrimination performance was statistically better than the clinical model (AUC 0.694 vs. AUC 0.607, p=0.004). In contrast, we found no significant difference in model performance in the non-renal pelvis subgroup (n=91).
CONCLUSIONS: Conventional radiomics improved the prediction of muscle-invasive UTUC compared to clinical models alone, but overall accuracy remained suboptimal for clinical use. Heterogeneity in CT protocols and challenges with tumor segmentation were the main limitations. Future work should develop more adaptable AI models trained on larger, more diverse datasets to better reflect real-world imaging conditions.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:
- Post the Article on any Web site
- Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
- Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
- Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.
The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.
You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.
The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:
- That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
- That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
- That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
- That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.







