What traits do urology programs value in elective students?
A survey of Canadian selection committee members
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9303Keywords:
Urology, Survey, Urology Elective, Program director, Selection Committee Member, residency selection, Best-Worst Scaling, Professionalism in medicine, CanMEDS frameworkAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Electives strongly influence residency selection. While the CanMEDS framework outlines core competencies, the specific traits most valued by urology programs during electives remain unclear.
METHODS: We surveyed selection committee members in Canadian urology residency programs. Using the CanMEDS framework, we developed 21 competencies and designed a best-worst scaling survey, where respondents selected the most and least important items from 21-question sets. A hierarchical Bayes model was used to calculate probability scores to rank each item and CanMEDS role. Scores reflect the likelihood of being chosen as most important.
RESULTS: Thirteen respondents completed the survey (34% response rate). Traits related to professionalism, initiative, and reliability ranked highest. Specifically, “Demonstrating appropriate behavior through honesty, integrity, punctuality, and respect” (12.4% [95% credible interval (CI) 11.9, 13.0]) and “Seeking out responsibilities by helping with rounds, doing consults, and organizing patient handover and discharge” (9.7% [8.5, 10.9]) were top ranked. In contrast, “Incorporating evidence on health disparities in urology when presenting cases or research findings” (0.1% [0.0, 0.2]) and “Discussing barriers to care, such as cost and access, and proposing solutions during rounds when appropriate” (0.0% [0.0, 0.1]) were lowest ranked. Among CanMEDS roles, Professional (9.9%) and Leader (8.1%) ranked highest, while Health Advocate (0.2%) and Scholar (1.8%) ranked lowest.
CONCLUSIONS: Canadian urology programs prioritize professionalism, initiative, and reliability during electives. In contrast, scholarly and advocacy competencies are viewed as less critical, possibly due to the short duration and clinical focus of electives. Our findings can guide students and programs in aligning expectations during urology electives.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:
- Post the Article on any Web site
- Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
- Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
- Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.
The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.
You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.
The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:
- That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
- That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
- That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
- That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.
