Increasing medical complexity among inpatients in urology over time
A comparative retrospective chart review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9183Keywords:
multimorbidity, delivery of healthcare, polypharmacy, urology, patient care managementAbstract
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate temporal trends in the medical complexity of urologic inpatients and investigate their implications for clinical care delivery.
METHODS: A retrospective comparative chart review was conducted for urologic inpatients admitted to a tertiary care center during two time periods: 2006–2007 and 2019–2020. A random sample of 150 patient charts from each cohort (N=300) was analyzed using a structured data extraction protocol in REDCap. Indicators of medical complexity included comorbidities, polypharmacy, and healthcare resource utilization. Statistical analyses comprised independent-samples t-tests, logistic regression, and multiple linear regression modeling.
RESULTS: Analysis of 300 patient records revealed a significant increase in medical complexity in the contemporary cohort compared to the historical cohort. Patients admitted in 2019–2020 exhibited higher Charlson comorbidity index scores, a greater number of chronic conditions, and increased polypharmacy. Utilization of home care services and specialist consultations during hospitalization was also more prevalent in the contemporary cohort. Although length of stay (LOS) remained comparable between cohorts, open abdominal surgery and the number of prescription medications were significant predictors of prolonged LOS (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The medical complexity of urologic inpatients has escalated over time, driven by increased comorbid burden and healthcare system interactions. Despite advances in surgical techniques that would traditionally reduce LOS, these improvements may be counterbalanced by the growing complexity of patient populations. Interventions, such as pre-admission optimization and integrated multidisciplinary care, are essential to address the challenges posed by this evolving clinical landscape.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:
- Post the Article on any Web site
- Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
- Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
- Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.
The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.
You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.
The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:
- That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
- That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
- That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
- That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.
