Does the digital rectal exam still provide value in the age of MRI?

Authors

  • Patrick Albers Urology Resident - University of Alberta
  • Noushin Miandashti Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta
  • Stacey Broomfield Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta
  • Adam Kinnaird Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9164

Keywords:

Prostate Cancer, Multiparametric MRI, DRE, T3 Disease

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Accurate staging of prostate cancer is essential for treatment planning and prognosis. While digital rectal exam (DRE) has traditionally been used, its limitations in detecting extracapsular extension (ECE) have led to increased reliance on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI).

METHODS: This study compared outcomes between T3 prostate cancer diagnosed by DRE vs. mpMRI only (i.e., not T3 by DRE) using data from the Alberta Prostate Cancer Research Initiative. The cohort included all 536 patients with cT3NxMx prostate cancer diagnosed between July 2014 and July 2024. The primary outcome was overall survival, with secondary outcomes including age at diagnosis, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at diagnosis, treatment modality, Gleason grade group, and metastasis at diagnosis.

RESULTS: Patients diagnosed as T3 by DRE were significantly older (71.6 vs. 67.9, p<0.001), had higher PSA levels (32% vs. 11% PSA >20 ng/ml, p<0.001), and higher Gleason grade groups (39% vs. 15% GG4+, p<0.001) compared to those diagnosed by mpMRI. DREdiagnosed patients underwent radiation therapy and primary androgen deprivation therapy more frequently than MRI-diagnosed patients. DRE-diagnosed patients also had higher rates of metastases at diagnosis (16% vs. 5%, p<0.001) and worse overall survival (hazard ratio 4.6, 95% confidence interval 1.4-15.0, p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS: T3 prostate cancer diagnosed by DRE is associated with more advanced disease, higher metastasis rates, and worse survival compared to mpMRI-diagnosed T3 disease. These findings suggest that T3 disease identified by DRE represents a more aggressive cancer subtype and should be considered higher-risk in clinical decision-making.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-08

How to Cite

Albers, P., Miandashti, N., Broomfield, S., & Kinnaird, A. (2025). Does the digital rectal exam still provide value in the age of MRI?. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 19(10), 357–60. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9164

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 10 (2025): CUAJ October

Section

Research Letter

License

You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:

  • Post the Article on any Web site
  • Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.

The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.

You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.

The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:

  • That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
  • That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
  • That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
  • That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.