Recurrent renal cell cancer: 10 years or more after nephrectomy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.829Abstract
Localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) responds well to surgery.Patients often question how long they have to be on surveillance
after their surgery. Several follow-up patterns have been described
in the literature. Until 2009, no published established Canadian
guidelines existed to assist Canadian health-care practitioners in
the surveillance of these patients. We present 3 cases of RCC that
recurred 10 years or longer after the initial nephrectomy. These
cases emphasize the need for careful long-term follow-up, as recommended
in the Canadian Urological Association guidelines.
We also discuss the optimism of prolonged disease survival in
the era of novel therapeutic agents that target angiogenesis.
Downloads
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:
- Post the Article on any Web site
- Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
- Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
- Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.
The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.
You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.
The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:
- That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
- That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
- That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
- That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.