Treatment outcome and predictors of poor clinical response in extensively drug-resistant gram-negative urinary tract infection among children: A single-institution experience

Authors

  • Carren Anne P. Batalla-Bocaling
  • Patrick Vincent P. Tanseco
  • Michael E. Chua

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.6475

Keywords:

extensively drug-resistant, urinary tract infection, children

Abstract

Introduction: Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) is defined as isolates sensitive only to two or fewer antimicrobial categories. This paper aims to present the treatment outcome and identify factors associated with poor clinical response among children with XDR gram-negative urinary tract infection (UTI).

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort conducted at a tertiary pediatric hospital from January 2014 to June 2017. All patients diagnosed with culture-proven XDR gram-negative UTI were identified and analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic and clinical characteristics. Patients were categorized according to treatment outcomes: success vs. failure. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess statistical differences between the groups and determined patient variables that are predictive of poor response. Odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were generated.

Results: A total of 29 (19.2%) XDR gram-negative pediatric UTIs were identified within the 42-month study period. No significant differences were noted in demographic characteristics between the groups. Treatment outcome of XDR gram-negative UTI patients showed that combination therapy with colistin had the highest success rate (40.9%), followed by non-colistin (36.4%) and combination therapy without colistin (22.7%). However, univariate analysis showed no significant difference among the different treatment groups (p=0.65). On multivariate logistic regression, receiving immunosuppressant and the presence of indwelling urinary catheters were independent predictors of poor clinical response among pediatric patients with XDR gram-negative UTI (OR 19.44, 95% CI 1.50–251.4, p=0.023 and OR 20.78, 95% CI 1.16–371.28, p=0.039; respectively).

Conclusions: The treatment success rate of XDR gram-negative pediatric UTI ranged from 22.7–36.4%. This finding emphasizes the need to advocate antibiotic stewardship to prevent further increase in XDR UTIs. Indwelling urinary catheters and receipt of immunosuppressants are associated with poor clinical outcome.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2020-08-07

How to Cite

Batalla-Bocaling, C. A. P. ., Tanseco, P. V. P., & Chua, M. E. . (2020). Treatment outcome and predictors of poor clinical response in extensively drug-resistant gram-negative urinary tract infection among children: A single-institution experience. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 15(3), E148–52. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.6475

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 3 (2021): CUAJ March

Section

Original Research

License

You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:

  • Post the Article on any Web site
  • Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.

The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.

You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.

The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:

  • That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
  • That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
  • That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
  • That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.