A systematic management algorithm for perioperative complications after robotic assisted partial nephrectomy
Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) is the treatment of choice for T1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Since the first robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) was performed in 2004, NSS is being implemented with increasing frequency. RAPN will likely become the gold standard procedure for T1 RCC due to improved dexterity, enhanced visualization, shorter learning curve, quicker recovery time, and shortened warm ischemic time. Although RAPN appears to be the preferred treatment for select renal tumours, there are notable complications in up to 35% of cases. While complications associated with RAPN are well-described, there is a lack of literature describing appropriate management strategies. Herein, we review complications associated with RAPN and design an appropriate systematic management algorithm.
Merseburger AS, Herrmann TRW, Shariat SF et al. EAU Guidelines on Robotic and Single-site Surgery in Urology. Eur Urol [Internet]. 2013;64(2):277–91. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283813005022
Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A et al. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol. 2009 Oct;182(4):1271–9.
Reifsnyder JE, Ramasamy R, Ng CK et al. Laparoscopic and Open Partial Nephrectomy: Complication Comparison Using the Clavien System. JSLS J Soc Laparoendosc Surg [Internet]. 2012;16(1):38–44. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3407455/
Gettman MT, Blute ML, Chow GK et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system. Urology. 2004 Nov;64(5):914–8.
Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG et al. Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes. J Urol. 2009 Sep;182(3):866–72.
Vittori G. Open versus robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicenter comparison study of perioperative results and complications. World J Urol [Internet]. 2014;32(1):287–93. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1136-x
Ellison JS, Montgomery JS, Wolf JSJ et al. A matched comparison of perioperative outcomes of a single laparoscopic surgeon versus a multisurgeon robot-assisted cohort for partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2012 Jul;188(1):45–50.
Wülfing C, Humke U. Offene und minimal-invasive partielle Nephrektomie. Urologe [Internet]. 2014;53(7):960–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-014-3512-6
Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG et al. Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: An International Experience. Eur Urol [Internet]. 2010;57(5):815–20. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283810000229
Aboumarzouk OM, Stein RJ, Eyraud R et al. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur Urol [Internet]. 2012;62(6):1023–33. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283812007397
Mari A, Antonelli A, Bertolo R, Bianchi G et al. Predictive factors of overall and major postoperative complications after partial nephrectomy: Results from a multicenter prospective study (The RECORd 1 project). Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Apr;43(4):823–30.
Mathieu R, Verhoest G, Droupy S et al. Predictive factors of complications after robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a retrospective multicentre study. BJU Int [Internet]. 2013 May 9;112(4):E283–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12222
Reddy UD, Pillai R, Parker RA et al. Prediction of complications after partial nephrectomy by RENAL nephrometry score. Ann R Coll Surg Engl [Internet]. 2014 Sep 4;96(6):475–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4474202/
Hew MN, Baseskioglu B, Barwari K et al. Critical appraisal of the PADUA classification and assessment of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2011 Jul;186(1):42–6.
Wang L, Lee BR. Robotic partial nephrectomy: current technique and outcomes. Int J Urol. 2013 Sep;20(9):848–59.
Kaouk JH, Hillyer SP, Autorino R et al. 252 Robotic Partial Nephrectomies: Evolving Renorrhaphy Technique and Surgical Outcomes at a Single Institution. Urology [Internet]. 2011;78(6):1338–44. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009042951102200X
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205–13.
Spana G, Haber G-P, Dulabon LM et al. Complications after robotic partial nephrectomy at centers of excellence: multi-institutional analysis of 450 cases. J Urol. 2011 Aug;186(2):417–21.
Kaouk JH, Khalifeh A, Hillyer S et al. Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Step-by-step Contemporary Technique and Surgical Outcomes at a Single High-volume Institution. Eur Urol [Internet]. 2012;62(3):553–61. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283812005970
Bertolo R, Autorino R, Simone G et al. Outcomes of Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Clinical T2 Renal Tumors: A Multicenter Analysis (ROSULA Collaborative Group). Eur Urol. 2018 Aug;74(2):226–32.
Tanagho YS, Kaouk JH, Allaf ME, et al. Perioperative Complications of Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Analysis of 886 Patients at 5 United States Centers. Urology [Internet]. 2013;81(3):573–80. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090429512015051
Benway BM, Wang AJ, Cabello JM, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy with sliding-clip renorrhaphy: technique and outcomes. Eur Urol. 2009 Mar;55(3):592–9.
Nepple KG, Sandhu GS, Rogers CG, et al. Description of a multicenter safety checklist for intraoperative hemorrhage control while clamped during robotic partial nephrectomy. Patient Saf Surg. 2012 Apr;6:8.
Zargar H, Allaf ME, Bhayani S, et al. Trifecta and optimal perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in surgical treatment of small renal masses: a multi‐institutional study. BJU Int [Internet]. 2015;116(3):407–14. Available from: http:https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12933
Khalifeh A, Autorino R, Eyraud R, et al. Three-year oncologic and renal functional outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol. 2013 Nov;64(5):744–50.
Hyams ES, Pierorazio P, Proteek O, et al. Iatrogenic Vascular Lesions After Minimally Invasive Partial Nephrectomy: A Multi-institutional Study of Clinical and Renal Functional Outcomes. Urology [Internet]. 2011;78(4):820–6. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009042951100584X
Potretzke AM, Knight BA, Zargar H, et al. Urinary fistula after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicentre analysis of 1 791 patients. BJU Int. 2016 Jan;117(1):131–7.
Caputo PA, Kaouk J. Management of complications arising from the treatment of small renal masses. Int J Surg [Internet]. 2016;36:583–7. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1743919116300231
Erlich T, Abu-Ghanem Y, Ramon J et al. Postoperative Urinary Leakage Following Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Mass: Risk Factors and a Proposed Algorithm for the Diagnosis and Management. Scand J Surg [Internet]. 2016 Jul 18;106(2):139–44. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1457496916659225
Gonzalez-Aguirre AJ, Durack JC. Managing Complications Following Nephron-Sparing Procedures for Renal Masses. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol [Internet]. 2016;19(3):194–202. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1089251616300166
Porpiglia F, Fiori C, Bertolo R, et al. The effects of warm ischaemia time on renal function after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in patients with normal contralateral kidney. World J Urol [Internet]. 2012 Apr;30(2):257–63. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0729-5
Kim CS, Bae EH, Ma SK, et al. Impact of partial nephrectomy on kidney function in patients with renal cell carcinoma. BMC Nephrol. 2014 Nov;15:181.
You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:
- Post the Article on any Web site
- Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
- Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
- Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.
The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.
You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.
The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:
- That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
- That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
- That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
- That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.