Improving access to surgical innovation in the community: Implementation of shared access model in Canadian healthcare
Binder J, Kramer W. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2001;87(4):408-410.
Leow JJ, Chang SL, Meyer CP, et al. Robot-assisted Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Contemporary Analysis of an All-payer Discharge Database. European Urology. February 2016:1-9. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.044.
Yuh BE, Ruel NH, Mejia R, Novara G, Wilson TG. Standardized comparison of robot-assisted limited and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2013;112(1):81-88. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11788.x.
Tewari A, Sooriakumaran P, Bloch DA, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Hebert AE, Wiklund P. Positive Surgical Margin and Perioperative Complication Rates of Primary Surgical Treatments for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Prostatectomy. European Urology. 2012;62(1):1-15. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.029.
Ontario CC. Prostate Cancer Surgery QBP Working Group Webinar. 2016.
Bolenz C, Gupta A, Hotze T, et al. Cost Comparison of Robotic, Laparoscopic, and Open Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer. European Urology. 2010;57(3):453-458. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.008.
Close A, Robertson C, Rushton S, et al. Comparative Cost-effectiveness of Robot-assisted and Standard Laparoscopic Prostatectomy as Alternatives to Open Radical Prostatectomy for Treatment of Men with Localised Prostate Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment from the Perspective of the UK National Health Service. European Urology. 2013;64(3):361-369. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.02.040.
Hughes D, Camp C, O'Hara J, Adshead J. Health resource use after robot-assisted surgery vs open and conventional laparoscopic techniques in oncology: analysis of English secondary care data for radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy. BJU Int. 2016;117(6):940-947. doi:10.1111/bju.13401.
Health Quality Ontario. Robotic Surgical System for Radical Prostatectomy: A Health Technology Assessment. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2017;17(11):1-172.
Pearce SM, Pariser JJ, Karrison T, Patel SG, Eggener SE. Comparison of Perioperative and Early Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy in a Contemporary Population Based Cohort. The Journal of Urology. 2016;196(1):76-81. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2016.01.105.
Liu J-J, Maxwell BG, Panousis P, Chung BI. Health Outcomes ResearchPerioperative Outcomes for Laparoscopic and Robotic Compared With Open Prostatectomy Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Database. URL. 2013;82(3):579-583. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2013.03.080.
Alemozaffar M, Sanda M, Yecies D, Mucci LA, Stampfer MJ, Kenfield SA. Benchmarks for operative outcomes of robotic and open radical prostatectomy: results from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. European Urology. 2015;67(3):432-438. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.039.
Trinh Q-D, Sammon J, Sun M, et al. Perioperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Compared With Open Radical Prostatectomy: Results From the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. European Urology. 2012;61(4):679-685. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.027.
Silberstein JL, Su D, Glickman L, et al. A case-mix-adjusted comparison of early oncological outcomes of open and robotic prostatectomy performed by experienced high volume surgeons. BJU Int. 2013;111(2):206-212. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11638.x.
Zorn KC, Gofrit ON, Orvieto MA, et al. Da Vinci Robot Error and Failure Rates: Single Institution Experience on a Single Three-Arm Robot Unit of More than 700 Consecutive Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomies. Journal of Endourology. 2007;21(11):1341-1344. doi:10.1089/end.2006.0455.
You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:
- Post the Article on any Web site
- Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
- Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
- Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.
The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.
You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.
The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:
- That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
- That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
- That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
- That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.