Surgeon-specific factors affecting treatment decisions among Canadian urologists in the management of pT1a renal tumours

Authors

  • Alexandra Leora Millman Division of Urology, Dept of Surgery St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto
  • Kenneth T. Pace Division of Urology, Dept of Surgery St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto
  • Michael Ordon Division of Urology, Dept of Surgery St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto
  • Jason Young Lee Division of Urology, Dept of Surgery St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.1884

Keywords:

renal cancer, small renal mass, surgeon, treatment decisions

Abstract

Introduction: The ubiquitous use of diagnostic imaging has resulted in an increased incidental detection of small renal masses (SRM). Patient- and tumour-related factors affect treatment decisions greatly; however, with multiple treatment options available, surgeon-specific characteristics and biases may also influence treatment recommendations. We determine the impact of surgeon-specific factors on treatment decisions in the management of SRM in Canada.

Methods: An online survey study was conducted among Canadian urologists currently registered with the Canadian Urological Association. The questionnaire collected demographic information and recommended treatments for 6 SRM index cases involving theoretical patients of various ages (51-80 years) and comorbidities.

Results: A total of 110 urologists responded (17% response rate) to the survey. Of these, 18% were over 65 years old and 45% were from academic centres. With increasing patient age and comorbidity, active surveillance and thermal ablative therapies were more the recommended treatment. Laparoscopic/robotic surgery was more commonly recommended by academic urologists and those under 65. Recommending surgery (radical nephrectomy or partial nephrectomy) for both elderly (about 80 years old) index patients correlated with surgeon age (surgeons over 65, p < 0.001), surgeons with no oncologic fellowship training (p = 0.021), surgeons with a non-academic practice (p = 0.003), surgeons with a personal history of cancer (p = 0.038) and surgeons with a family history of cancer death in the last 10 years (p = 0.022).

Conclusions: There are various factors that influence the management options offered to patients with SRMs. Our results suggest that surgeon age, personal history of cancer, practice-type and other surgeon-specific variables may affect treatments offered among urologists across Canada.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2014-06-16

How to Cite

Millman, A. L., Pace, K. T., Ordon, M., & Lee, J. Y. (2014). Surgeon-specific factors affecting treatment decisions among Canadian urologists in the management of pT1a renal tumours. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 8(5-6), 183–9. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.1884

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 5-6 (2014): CUAJ June

Section

Original Research

License

You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:

  • Post the Article on any Web site
  • Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.

The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.

You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.

The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:

  • That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
  • That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
  • That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
  • That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.