Reporting the Canadian robotic experience: The outcomes and how we report them

Authors

  • Stephen E Pautler The University of Western Ontario / Western University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.1689

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Stephen E Pautler, The University of Western Ontario / Western University

Associate Professor of Urology and Surgical Oncology

References

Nickel JC. Are we being seduced by a robot? Can Urol Assoc J 2009;3(5):359-36.

Nelson JB. Debate: Open radical prostatectomy vs laparoscopic vs robotic. Urol Oncol 2007;25(6):490-3.

Rabin RC. Salesmen in the surgical suite. New York Times, March 25, 2013.

Al-Hathal, ¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬____________, __________, et al. Perioperative, oncological and functional outcomes of the first robotic prostatectomy program in Quebec: Single fellowship-trained surgeon’s experience of 250 cases. Can Urol Assoc J 2013;7(9):___- ___.

Bianco FJ Jr, Scardino PT, Eastham JA. Radical prostatectomy: Long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function (“trifecta”). Urology 2005;66(5 Suppl):83-94.

Patel VR, Sivaraman A, Coelho RF, et al. Pentafecta: A new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2001;59(5):702-7.

Lawrentschuk N, Evans A, Srigley J, et al. Surgical margin status among men with organ-confined (pT2) prostate cancer: a population-based study. Can Urol Assoc J 2011; 5(3):161-6.

Chin JL, Srigley J, Mayhew LA, et al. Guideline for optimization of surgical and pathological quality performance for radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer management: evidentiary base. Can Urol Assoc J 2010;4(1):13-25.

Downloads

Published

2013-10-09

How to Cite

Pautler, S. E. (2013). Reporting the Canadian robotic experience: The outcomes and how we report them. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 7(9-10), 333–4. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.1689

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 9-10 (2013): CUAJ October

Section

Commentary

License

You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:

  • Post the Article on any Web site
  • Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.

The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.

You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.

The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:

  • That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
  • That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
  • That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
  • That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.