TY - JOUR AU - Khambati, Aziz M. AU - Wehbi, Elias AU - Farhat, Walid A. PY - 2015/02/05 Y2 - 2024/03/28 TI - Laparo-endoscopic Single Site Surgery in Pediatrics: Feasibility and surgical outcomes from a preliminary prospective Canadian experience. JF - Canadian Urological Association Journal JA - CUAJ VL - 9 IS - 1-2 SE - Original Research DO - 10.5489/cuaj.2379 UR - https://cuaj.ca/index.php/journal/article/view/2379 SP - 48-52 AB - <p><strong>Introduction:</strong> Laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) is becoming an alternative to standard laparoscopic surgery. Proposed advantages include enhanced cosmesis and faster recovery. We assessed the early post-operative surgical outcomes of LESS surgery utilizing different instruments in the pediatric urological population in Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> We prospectively captured data on all patients undergoing LESS at our institution between February 2011 and August 2012. This included patient age, operative time, length of stay, complications and short-term surgical outcomes. Different instruments/ devices were used to perform the procedures. Access was achieved through a transumbilical incision.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> A total of 16 LESS procedures were performed, including seven pyeloplasties, four unilateral and one bilateral varicocelectomies, two simple nephrectomies, one renal cyst decortication and one pyelolithotomy. There was no statistical difference in the operative times, hospital length of stay and cost (pyeloplasty only) in patients undergoing pyeloplasty and varicocelectomy using the LESS technique when compared to an age matched cohort of patients managed with the traditional laparoscopic approach. One pyeloplasty in the LESS group required conversion to open due to a small intra-renal pelvis. There were no immediate or short term post-operative complications; however, one patient experienced a decrease in renal function status post LESS pyeloplasty. Since all procedures were performed by a vastly experienced surgeon at a tertiary center, the generalizability of the results cannot be assessed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> There are only a few series that have assessed the role of LESS in pediatric urological surgery. Although our experience is limited by a heterogeneous group of patients with a short follow-up period, the present cohort demonstrates the safety and feasibility of LESS. Further evaluation with randomized studies is required to better assess the role of LESS in pediatric urology.</p> ER -