residents’ room  
An unusual case of polyembolokoilamania: Urethral avulsion from  
foreign object use during sexual gratification  
Garson Chan, MD; Adiel Mamut, MD; Stephanie Tatzel, MD; Blayne Welk, MD, MSc  
Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada  
Cite as: Can Urol Assoc J 2016;10(5-6):E181-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.3778  
Published online May 12, 2016.  
forcefully removed the tubing, which when removed was  
found to have an approximately 1 cm knot at the end. On  
presentation to the hospital, it appeared that he avulsed a  
portion of his urethra. His scrotum and penis were swollen  
and ecchymotic. A 5 cm portion of intussuscepted penile  
urethra was attached to the glans and bleeding (Fig. 1). The  
patient was consented for surgical exploration, possible  
urethral repair in a single or multistage manner, or poten-  
tially a perineal urethrostomy. A suprapubic catheter was  
placed prior to operative management.  
Abstract  
Polyembolokoilamania is the insertion of foreign objects into  
body orifices for sexual gratification. While the retrieval of  
these objects from the urethra and bladder is a well-known  
task among urologists, we present a rare case of an usual and  
serious injury from this practice: complete avulsion of the  
urethra at the penoscrotal junction. A single-stage urethro-  
plasty was used to reconstruct the urethra with good result.  
The patient motivation, as well as concomitant medical or  
psychological conditions, should be explored in order to  
prevent further occurences.  
Intraoperatively, we confirmed the diagnosis by exam-  
ining the protruding portion of urethral tissue. The edge  
was grasped with a Babcock and the urethral intussception  
reduced (Fig. 2A). A penoscrotal incision was made; dissec-  
tion was carried down to the end of the Babcock and the  
distal end of the bulbar urethra identified. Care was taken  
to minimize trauma to surrounding skin and fascia layers.  
The urethral viability was confirmed with active bleeding  
and blanching and filling of the spongiosum with pressure.  
Cystoscopy was carried out, which showed false passages  
and mucosa damage at the level of the prostatic urethra and  
a normal bladder without any retained foreign bodies. The  
penile urethra appeared to have separated from the corpo-  
ral bodies and bucks fascia with minimal trauma and the  
peno-glandular urethral junction was intact. Consideration  
was given to a staged repair, however, the urethral tissue  
appeared to be healthy and a single-stage procedure was  
felt to minimize morbidity and provide maximal salvage of  
the urethral plate tissue. The proximal portion of the penile  
urethral plate was split in half from the injury (Fig. 2B). This  
was repaired in two layers using 5-0 moncryl. The edges  
of the penile and bulbar urethral were then freshened and  
a two-layer closure undertaken using 5-0 monocryl (Fig.  
2C). A 16 French urethral catheter and a drain were left.  
The patient was discharged home on postoperative Day 1  
with the suprapubic and urethra catheter draining. At six  
weeks postoperative, a retrograde urethrogram (RUG) did  
not show any evidence of extravasation and his urethral  
catheter was removed. His suprapubic tube was removed a  
Introduction  
The insertion of foreign objects into the genitourinary tract  
is commonly reported in the literature and our colleagues in  
general surgery, gynecology, and otolaryngology also man-  
1
-3  
age these problems (depending on the orifice). There are  
many motivations and etiologies, however most are related  
to sexual satisfaction (polyembolokoilamania). Specifically,  
for urethral manipulation, this likely leads to prostatic stimu-  
lation and activation of hypogastric nerve afferents, leading  
4
to sexual pleasure. This case is unusual due to the result-  
ing injury, which to our knowledge, has not been reported  
before.  
Case report  
A 65-year-old man was transferred from an outside emergen-  
cy department due to the sudden onset of penile pain, bleed-  
ing, urethral “mass or clot” at the meatus, and an inability  
to void after a urethral trauma. Earlier that evening, he had  
been self-instrumenting his urethra using plastic tubing for  
sexual gratification. He had passed the tubing down the  
urethra, but subsequently had difficulty removing it. He then  
CUAJ • May-June 2016 • Volume 10, Issues 5-6  
2016 Canadian Urological Association  
E181  
©
Chaꢀ ꢁꢂ al.  
Discussion  
There are a wide range of self-inflicted injuries involving  
the genitourinary tract from foreign bodies that are inserted  
either traumatically, accidentally, or intentionally.1-3,5,6 The  
actual prevalence of this practice is unknown, due to the  
nature of the event. Many patients repeat this behaviour and  
even the development of complications and hospitalization  
6
,7  
may not be enough to stop this activity. Delayed presen-  
tation is common due to embarrassment and may result in  
further injury, complications, and migration. Usually, the  
symptoms of foreign body insertion include hematuria, pain,  
retention, infections, or voiding dysfunction. The diagnosis  
is based on the patient offering a candid history, radiologic  
exams, or cystoscopy. Complications may include mucosal  
tears, false passages, stenosis, infection, abscess, pain, erec-  
tile dysfunction, fistula formation, and further lower urinary  
1
-3,5,8  
tract symptoms.  
After the acute urological problem is  
managed, the motive and underlying etiology should also  
be considered. Medical and psychosocial issues often exist,  
which require further assessment. The etiology of polyem-  
bolokoilamania may be related to medical conditions, such  
as mood and cognitive disorders, drug abuse, malingering,  
Fig. 1. Appearance of intussuscepted urethra at presentation.  
7
or most commonly sexual gratification.  
week later after a trial of clamping for two days. After four  
weeks of normal voiding without catheters, a second RUG  
demonstrated an intact urethra with some narrowing of the  
proximal penile and penoscrotal urethra (Fig. 3). A 16 French  
flexible cystoscope could be advanced easily through the  
urethra. He did not report any voiding complaints and had  
achieved erections without significant chordee.  
In this case, recognition that the extruding urethral mass  
was viable urethral tissue and not clot, as well as a care-  
ful and prompt surgical repair provided an excellent cos-  
metic and functional result. While a ureteral avulsion is a  
9
rare but dreaded complication of ureteroscopy, avulsion  
has not, to our knowledge, been described for the urethra.  
If there had been more extensive loss of urethral tissue,  
a staged procedure with a temporary penoscrotal opening  
Fig. 2. Intraoperative appearance of: (A) the urethra reduced into place using a Babcock; (B) the partially split urethral plate at the penoscrotal junction held by  
Babcocks; and (C) the repaired urethra.  
E182  
CUAJ • May-June 2016 • Volume 10, Issues 5-6  
Uꢃꢁꢂhꢃal avulꢄꢅꢆꢀ fꢃꢆꢇ fꢆꢃꢁꢅgꢀ ꢆbjꢁcꢂ  
Conclusion  
We describe the successful single-stage management of an  
emergent urologic presentation of a urethral avulsion as a  
result of a self-stimulation with rubber tubing.  
Competing interests: Dr. Welk has participated in clinical trials for Astellas. The remaining authors  
declare no competing financial or personal interests.  
This paper has been peer-reviewed.  
References  
1
2
.
.
van Ophoven A, deKernion JB. Clinical management of foreign bodies of the genitourinary tract. J Urol  
000;164:274-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67342-9  
2
Walsh P, Moustafa M. Retention of urethrovesical foreign bodies: Case report and literature review. J  
Emerg Med 2000;19:241-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0736-4679(00)00232-8  
Wenderoth U, Jonas U. Curiosity in urology? Masturbation injuries. Eur Urol 1980;6:312-3.  
Komisaruk BR, Beyer-Flores C, Whipple B. The Science of Orgasm. Published by Hopkins Fulfillment  
Service, 2006.  
3
4
.
.
Fig. 3. Retrograde urethrogram eight weeks after the injury (four weeks post-  
catheter removal).  
5
.
.
Granados EA, Riley G, Rios GJ, et al. Self-introduction of urethrovesical foreign bodies. Eur Urol  
1
991;19:259-61.  
would have been appropriate. This patient is still at risk of  
developing a symptomatic urethral stricture, however, the  
preservation of the majority of the urethral plate and minimal  
disruption to the tissue and blood supply of the surround-  
ing penile and scrotal skin with this single-stage procedure  
should maximize the operative possibilities should he need  
a future urethroplasty. He was counseled about the risks of  
future self-urethral instrumentation, referred to his family  
physician for psychiatric care, and followup will be carried  
out to monitor for voiding dysfunction.  
6
Costa G, Di Tonno F, Capodieci S, et al. Self-introduction of foreign bodies into the urethra: A multidisciplin-  
ary problem. Int Urol Nephrol 1993;25:77-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02552258  
7. Unruh BT, Nejad SH, Stern TW, et al. Insertion of foreign bodies (polyembolokoilamania): Underpinnings  
and management strategies. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2012;14:1. http://dx.doi.org/10.4088/  
pcc.11f01192  
Rahman NU, Elliott SP, McAninch JW. Self-inflicted male urethral foreign body insertion: Endoscopic  
management and complications. BJU Int 2004;94:1051-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-  
8
.
4
10X.2004.05103.x  
9. Tanimoto R, Cleary RC, Bagley DH, et al. Ureteral avulsion associated with ureteroscopy: Insights from  
the MAUDE database. J Endourol 2016;30:257-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2015.0242  
Correspondence: Dr. Blayne Welk, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada;  
bkwelk@gmail.com  
CUAJ • May-June 2016 • Volume 10, Issues 5-6  
E183