A hospital-based study on initial observation for low-risk prostate cancer and its predictors in the United States

Authors

  • Matthew J. Maurice University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
  • Hui Zhu Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center and Cleveland Clinic South Pointe Hospital, Cleveland, OH, USA
  • Robert Abouassaly University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.2606

Keywords:

Prostatic Neoplasms, Observation, Utilization, Trends, Watchful Waiting, Active Surveillance

Abstract

Introduction: Initial observation (IO) is a strategy to minimize prostate cancer overtreatment. We sought to evaluate contemporary trends in IO utilization for low-risk prostate cancer in the United States and to identify factors associated with its uptake.

Methods: Using the National Cancer Database, we identified men with low-risk prostate cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2011. IO utilization was plotted over time. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine the influence of diagnosis year and other factors on IO selection.

Results: Of the 219 971 men with low-risk prostate cancer, 21 231 (9.7%) underwent IO. Beginning in 2008, IO use increased significantly with time (range: 7.5%–14.3%). Compared to 2004, patients diagnosed in 2011 had 2.5 times the odds of choosing IO (odds ratio [OR] 2.5, confidence interval [CI] 2.3–2.6, p < 0.01). Aside from diagnosis year, age, race, Charlson score, clinical T stage, and PSA level predicted IO use (p < 0.01). Other predictors of IO included hospital type, insurance provider, and household income. Specifically, comprehensive cancer centres, private insurance, and higher income predicted decreased IO usage (OR 0.5, CI 0.5–0.5, p < 0.01; OR 0.4, CI 0.4–0.4, p < 0.01; and OR 0.8, CI 0.8–0.9, p < 0.01, respectively). Less educated men were also less likely to undergo observation (OR 0.8, CI 0.8–0.9, p < 0.01). Treatment within the western United States was significantly, but weakly, associated with increased use of IO (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: In recent years, low-risk prostate cancer has been increasingly managed with IO, appropriately driven by patient and disease factors. Unexpectedly, observation usage also varies by race, hospital, insurance, income, and geography, suggesting that non-clinical factors may affect treatment selection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Matthew J. Maurice, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA

Urology

Hui Zhu, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center and Cleveland Clinic South Pointe Hospital, Cleveland, OH, USA

Urology

Robert Abouassaly, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA

Urology

Downloads

Published

2015-04-13

How to Cite

Maurice, M. J., Zhu, H., & Abouassaly, R. (2015). A hospital-based study on initial observation for low-risk prostate cancer and its predictors in the United States. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 9(3-4), E193–9. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.2606

Issue

Section

Original Research

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.